<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google-Bombing Still Works</title>
	<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works</link>
	<description>Not Your Average Geek</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DuckMan</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>DuckMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Thanks BK!

I appreciate your comments :)

Cheers,

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks BK!</p>
<p>I appreciate your comments <img src='http://www.utheguru.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>BK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Great Blog.. I have learned quote a bit in a few moments... Very Funny too.. Thanks.. K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Blog.. I have learned quote a bit in a few moments&#8230; Very Funny too.. Thanks.. K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuckMan</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>DuckMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Thanks James!

Appreciate your visit and comments - stick around!

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks James!</p>
<p>Appreciate your visit and comments - stick around!</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Galway</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>James Galway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Its funny you mentioned an experiment on your own site.. I ve tried this for various keywords and with low competition its very easy to get high serps for keywords unrelated to the site...

Funny that! :)

Great Blog , keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its funny you mentioned an experiment on your own site.. I ve tried this for various keywords and with low competition its very easy to get high serps for keywords unrelated to the site&#8230;</p>
<p>Funny that! <img src='http://www.utheguru.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great Blog , keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMu</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Ok, you caught me - I read an older version :). They've since removed "failure" from the page's content, so it's possible that they'll drop out of the #1 spot again. I think the Googlebombing-algorithm is very fine targeted; it's not something that discounts anchor text automatically, it requires a few factors to be in place before it triggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you caught me - I read an older version :). They&#8217;ve since removed &#8220;failure&#8221; from the page&#8217;s content, so it&#8217;s possible that they&#8217;ll drop out of the #1 spot again. I think the Googlebombing-algorithm is very fine targeted; it&#8217;s not something that discounts anchor text automatically, it requires a few factors to be in place before it triggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuckMan</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>DuckMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Wow! That was quick John!

Try hitting refresh - I was premature in publishing the article and it's been changed since you first read it - have you got me on feed? I'll often publish, read, and then adjust my new posts a couple times during the first hour or so when I'm writing an opus like this one.

w.r.t. miserable failure and bush being back in the top three - that would possibly give a few more clues about how the alg works - but a search for &lt;a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&#038;q=miserable+failure&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;meta="&gt;miserable failure&lt;/a&gt; still doesn't show bush on the front page, at least for me - and it does seem that Australian searchers get different results in Google than the US. Damn - I was getting a bit excited for a mo there!

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That was quick John!</p>
<p>Try hitting refresh - I was premature in publishing the article and it&#8217;s been changed since you first read it - have you got me on feed? I&#8217;ll often publish, read, and then adjust my new posts a couple times during the first hour or so when I&#8217;m writing an opus like this one.</p>
<p>w.r.t. miserable failure and bush being back in the top three - that would possibly give a few more clues about how the alg works - but a search for <a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&#038;q=miserable+failure&#038;btnG=Google+Search&#038;meta=">miserable failure</a> still doesn&#8217;t show bush on the front page, at least for me - and it does seem that Australian searchers get different results in Google than the US. Damn - I was getting a bit excited for a mo there!</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMu</title>
		<link>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.utheguru.com/google-bombing-still-works#comment-489</guid>
		<description>... but ... there's a difference between ranking someone else's site for a keyword that doesn't exist on their site (GoogleBombing) and just using anchor text to achieve better rankings for yourself (especially when you do have that keyword on your site somewhere). 

Look at "failure" - as soon as they (accidentally, I assume) added the word to their pages, it has started to rank in the top 3 again. 

It's easier to rank your own site, with the keyword on it somewhere or with an obscure enough keyword. That's not really GoogleBombing, it's just a natural part of white-hat SEO :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; but &#8230; there&#8217;s a difference between ranking someone else&#8217;s site for a keyword that doesn&#8217;t exist on their site (GoogleBombing) and just using anchor text to achieve better rankings for yourself (especially when you do have that keyword on your site somewhere). </p>
<p>Look at &#8220;failure&#8221; - as soon as they (accidentally, I assume) added the word to their pages, it has started to rank in the top 3 again. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easier to rank your own site, with the keyword on it somewhere or with an obscure enough keyword. That&#8217;s not really GoogleBombing, it&#8217;s just a natural part of white-hat SEO :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
